CCARF Practice Question

Paper 3 · Question 43

D3 Claude Code Configuration & Workflows · Paper 3

[Scenario 5: Claude Code for Continuous Integration] You are integrating Claude Code into a CI/CD pipeline for automated code review, test generation, and pull-request feedback — designing prompts that produce actionable findings while minimizing false positives. Reviews re-run after each new commit to a PR, and the bot re-posts the same findings every time — developers now mute it. How should re-reviews be designed?

• A.Include the prior review's findings in context and instruct Claude to report only new issues or previously reported ones that remain unaddressed
• B.Review only the newest commit's diff in isolation
• C.Limit reviews to one per PR regardless of subsequent commits
• D.Post all findings again but formatted differently to seem new

Show answer & explanations

Correct answer: A

A: Duplicate suppression is a context design problem: give the reviewer its own prior findings and the explicit instruction to report deltas — new issues plus unresolved carryovers — and the noise stops while coverage remains complete.

B: misses issues that emerge from interaction with earlier commits

C: leaves everything after the first push unreviewed

D: disguises the spam developers already muted

Related Claude Code Configuration & Workflows questions

More: Paper 3 · All practice questions