Paper 1 · Question 47

A: Concrete examples fix inconsistent interpretation of known transformations. The developer's problem is not inconsistency but rather gaps in domain knowledge about regulatory requirements. Examples cannot surface unknown compliance considerations.

B: Plan mode is for evaluating implementation strategies when the requirements are understood. The developer's gap is in domain requirements (regulatory compliance), not in technical approach selection.

C: The interview pattern is specifically designed for unfamiliar domains where the developer might miss important considerations. By having Claude ask probing questions about regulatory requirements, the developer surfaces constraints they might not have considered, leading to a more compliant design.

D: Iterating from test failures works when the requirements are known and tests can be written upfront. Healthcare compliance requirements that the developer does not know about cannot be captured in tests. Missing a regulatory requirement is not something that shows up as a test failure.